視覺與產品設計師的想像力個人特質差異之研究 / The Similarities and Differences Between Visual and Product Designers’ Personal Characteristics of Imagination among Design Processes
摘要
自古以來有文字或圖像的記載，就有想像力的存在。然而，可能有些人認為想像力是天馬行空的，必需摒棄一切常規及限制，才能形成真正的想像力。在不同的領域中，想像力都具備相當重要的角色，Bauhaus 建築學院鼓勵建築工程與藝術結合，要求學生運用想像力進行建築設計；考古學家從殘磚碎瓦中透過想像力，重建建築或是物體的全貌；畫家則以想像的觀點，來描繪世界。因此本研究主要的問題在於，在視覺設計及產品設計中，有那些個人特質的因子會促發想像力的形成？本研究將透過文獻，整理出與個人特質有關的想像力因子，共十個形容詞組，透過語意差異法將十組個人的特質因子，以單一樣本t檢定、各設計階段之配對樣本t檢定、獨立樣本t檢定、最後以因子分析歸納出較重要的因子特徵，並同時比較四個不同設計階段，視覺設計師與產品設計師之間個人特質想像力因子的差異。
Imagination plays a key role in various domains in helping to create innovative ideas, drawings, poems, movies, products...etc. In both visual and product design domains, the personal characteristics of imagination are crucial abilities for conceiving novel ideas during design processes. This study focuses on personal characteristic differences and similarities between visual and product design designers for triggering imagination during four design stages. Using the semantic differential (SD) method, this study conducted a questionnaire with 10-paired personal characteristics, and analyzed several identical and different characteristics of visual and product designers in the process of product design. In sum, the similarities and differentials of personal characteristics between visual and product designers within 4 product design stages are concluded at the end of this paper.
全文：
PDF參考文獻
Amheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.
Clark, R. E. (1998). The CANE model of motivation to learn and to work: A two-Stage process of goal commitment and effort, In J. Lowyck (Eds.), Trend in corporate training, 1-25, Leuven Belgium: University of Leuven Press.
Claxton, G., Edwards, L. & Scale-Constantinou, V. (2006). Cultivating creative mentalities: A framework for education. Published in Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(1), 57-61.
Desmet, P. M. A., Overbeeke, C. J., and Tax, S. J. E. T. (2001). Designing products with added emotional value: Develop application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4(1), 32-46.
Ertmer, P. A., Newby, T. J. & Macdougall, M. (1996). Students’ responses to case-based instruction: The role of perceived value. Paper presented at annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, Inc.
Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions, and personal agency beliefs. Newburk Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Goldschmidt, G. 1991. The dialectics of sketching. Design studies, 12, 123-143.
Heufler, G. (2005). Design Basics: From ideas to products. 龍溪圖書.
Huebner, L. A. & Lawson, J. M. (1990). Understanding and assessing college environment. In D. G. Creamer & Associates, College student development: Theory and practice for the 1990s. Alexandria, VA: ACPA, 127-151.
McMillan, M. (1995). Education through the imagination. England : thoemmes Press.
Osgood. (1990). Meaning, and Culture. New York: C. E. Language.
Passmore, J. (1985). Recent philosophers: A supplement to a hundred years of philosophy. NY: Duckworth Publishing.
Purcell, T. and Gero, J. S. 1998. Drawings and the design process. Design studies, 19: 389-430.
Schön, D. A. and Wiggins, G. 1992. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design studies, 13(2): 135-156.
Strange, C. C. (1993). Developmental impacts of campus living environments. In R. B. Winston, Jr., S. Anchors & Associates, Student housing and residential life. 134-166. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Strange, C. C. (1996). Dynamics of campus environments. In S. R. Komives, D. B. Woodard Jr., & Associates. (Eds.), Student service: A handbook for profession. (3rd) 244-268. San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
Suwa, M., Purcell, T., and Gero, J. S. 1998. Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions. Design studies, 19: 455-583.
Suwa, M. and Tversky, B. 1997. What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches ? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18: 385-403.
Wigfield, A. (1994). The role of children’s achievement values in the self-regulation of their learning outcomes. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zhai , L. Y., Khoo, L. P., and Zhong, Z. W. (2009). A rough set based decision support approach to improving consumer affective satisfaction in product design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39 (2), 295-302.
蔡淑桂（1999）。想像力和創造歷程。創造思考教育，9，54-56。
張鍠焜（2003）。想像力的培養。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系教育哲學經典研讀會，取自 http://academic.ed.ntnu.edu.tw/~scpe/txt/921208-2.htm
黃玉（2003）。從環境中增進學生事務功能－論學校環境與學生發展。載於林至善（主編），學生事務與社團輔導第三輯，2。台北市：東吳大學。
葉紹國（1978）。幼兒想像遊戲之研究，台灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文，頁8。
陳瓊花 (1995) 。藝術概論，台灣:三民書局股份有限公司。
吳靜吉（2002）。華人學生創造力的發掘與培育，應用心理研究，第 15 期。
李璞珉 (1996)。心理學與藝術。北京：首都師範大學，頁286。
滕守堯（1997）。審美心理描述。四川: 人民，頁1。
黃崇彬和原田昭（1998）。「日本感性工學發展現況及其在遠隔控制介面設計上應用的可能性」，中日設計教育研討會論文集，第17-26頁。
王宗興（2001）。自行車車架造形特徵對意象認知影響之研究，2001 海峽兩岸工業設計學術及實務研討會論文集，第289-294 頁。