應用MBTI性格量表探討消費者對不同比例矩形之偏好 / Application of the MBTI personality scale to investigate consumers’ preferences for different ratios of rectangles
摘要
黃金比例是否為普遍偏好的比例，至今仍備受爭議。本研究主要目的以心理測驗所發展出可歸納不同類型性格的MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator)，來調查性格及教育背景是否會影響比例的偏好。本實驗分為兩階段進行。第一階段，本研究總共調查406位受試者，其中，有324位(設計師128位和一般人196位)擁有單一性格的人，再作進一步探討。第二階段，有十五種矩形比例(包括水平和垂直樣本)作測試。要求受試者以5點量表評估每種矩形的喜好。其研究結果，分別顯示：(1)比例的喜好程度可分成三個趨向：大多數人最喜歡的比例為正方形，黃金比例喜歡的程度為普通，超過黃金比例之後的比例漸漸趨向於不喜歡；(2)性格及教育背景皆會影響喜好的比例；(3)理性性格的人偏向較喜歡方正的比例，而感性性格的人則較能接受極端比例。其結果有助於未來在進行市場定位及產品外型設計之參考。
Whether the golden ratio is the favorite ratio for people remains a controversial research issue until now. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the personality factor affects people’s ratio preference, by classifying people into different personality types based on the MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) test from developmental psychology. There were two steps in this process. In the first step, a total of 406 subjects were surveyed in this study. Among them, 324 subjects (128 designers and 196 novices) with single-type personality were used as subjects for a further survey. In step 2, 15 rectangle ratios were tested, including horizontal and vertical samples. Subjects were asked to evaluate their preferences for each rectangle by using a Likert 1 to 5 score. The results of the study are summarized as follows: (1) The tendency of preference for varied ratios can be divided into three classes: for people who tend to like the ratio of a square, the preference for a golden ratio is fair, and when the ratio increases to exceed the golden ratio, it will be gradually disliked; (2) Both personality and educational background can affect the ratio preference; (3) ‘Thinking’ type of people are more likely to prefer the nearly ‘square’ rectangle, while the Feeling type people are more able to accept the extreme proportions of rectangles. This result could be used as guidelines for product design and market position setting.
關鍵詞
全文：
PDF參考文獻
Agor, W. H. (1991). How intuition can be used to enhance creativity in organizations. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 1-19.
Arnau, R. C., Rosen, D., and Thompson, B. (2000). Reliability and validity of scores from the Singer-Loomis Type Deployment Inventory. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 45, 409-426.
Avramović, D., Vladić, G., Kašiković, N, and Ivan, P. (2013). Aplicability of golden ratio rule in modern product design. Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design, 4(1), 29-35.
Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Centyry-Crofts: New York.
Beyoğlu, A., and Per, M. (2011). Personality types of students who study at the departments of numeric, verbal and fine arts in education faculties. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 242-247.
Borg, M. O., and Shapiro, S. L.(1996). Personality type and student performance in principles of economics. Journal of Economics Education, 2(1), 3-25.
Bostrom, R. P., Olfman, L., and Sein, M. K. (1988). End-user computing: A research framework for investigating the training/learning process. Human Factors in Management Information Systems, 221-250.
Buchanan, D. R., and Bandy, C. (1984). Jungian typology of prospective psychodramatists: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator analysis of applicants for psychodrama training. Psychological Reports, 55, 599-606.
Buchanan, D. R., and Taylor, J. A. (1986). Jungian typology of professional psychodramatists: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator analysis of certified psychodramatists. Psychological Reports, 58, 391-400.
Burley, T., and Handler, L. (1997). Personality factors in the accurate interpretation of projective tests. In E. F. Hammer (Ed.), Advances in projective drawing interpretation (pp. 359 –377). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas Publisher.
Carne, G. C., and Kirton, M. J. (1982). Styles of creativity: Test-score correlations between Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 50, 31-36.
Carne, G. C., and Kirton, M. J. (1982). Styles of creativity: Test-score correlations between Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 50, 3-36.
Carter, B. A., Nelson, D. L., and Duncombe, L. W. (1983). The effect of psychological type on the mood and meaning of two collage activities. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 37, 688-693.
Cheng, Y., Kim, K. H., and Hull, M. F. (2010). Comparisons of Creative Styles and Personality Types Between American and Taiwanese College Students and the Relationship Between Creative Potential and Personality Types. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 103-112.
Dollinger, S. J., Palaskonis, G. D., and Pearson, J. L. (2004). Creativity and intuition revisited. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 244-259.
Elam, K. (2001). Geometry of Design. New York : Princeton Architectural Press.
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Creativity as a product of intelligence and personality. In D. H. Saklofske and M. Zeidner (Ed.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp. 231-247). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Fechner, G. T.(1876). Vorschule der Aesthetik. Leipzing: Breitkopf and Härtel.
Feist, J. G. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fisher, R., and Scheib, J. (1971). Creative performance and the hallucinogenic drug-induced creative experience or one man’s brain-damage is another’s creativity. Confinia Psychiatrica, 14(3-4), 174-202.
Friedenberg, J. (2012). Aesthetic judgment of triangular shape: compactness and not the golden ratio determines perceived attractiveness. i-Perception, 3, 163-175.
Godkewitsch, M.(1976). The golden section: An artifact of stimulus rang and measure of preference. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 269-277.
Gryskiewicz, N. D., and Tullar, W. L. (1995). The relationship between personality type and creativity style among managers. Journal of Psychological Type, 32, 30-35.
Hall, W. B. (1969). Personality inventory correlates of creativity among architects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 322-326.
Hammond, J., and Edelmann, R. J. (1991). The act of being: Personality characteristics of professional actors, amateur actors and non-actors. In G. Wilson (Ed.), Psychology and performing arts. Amsterdam/Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeitlinger.
Hartzell, E. A. (2000). Visual creativity through the prism of psychological type. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60, 5774.
Helson, R. (1965). Childhood interest clusters related to creativity in women. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 352-361.
Hill, O. W. (1987). Intuition: Inferential heuristic or epistemic mode? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 7, 137-154.
Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., and Wilson, G. V. (2003). An examination of the relationship between personality type and cognitive style. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 343-354.
Jacobson, C. M. (1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in USA. Psychological Reports, 72, 1131–1138.
Jacobson, C. M. (1993). Cognitive styles of creativity: Relations of scores on the
Johnson, R. C. (2004). Study of the relationship between cognitive styles of creativity and personality types of military leaders. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(10-A), 3859.
Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological types or the psychology of individuation. Oxford, England: Harcourt, Brace.
Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological types. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kelgeri, Khadi, P. B., and Phadnis (1989). Creativity among urban and rural boys and girls. Indian Journal of Behaviour, 13(4), 10-14.
Kern, G.M., and Matta, K.F.(1987). Learning style as an influence on the effectiveness of self-paced computer-assisted instruction: Preliminary result. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 13(4), 203-207.
Kirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator among managers in USA. Psychological Reports, 72, 1131-1138.
Kroeger, O., and Thuesen, J. M.(1988). Type Talk: The 16 Personality Types That Determine How We Live, Love, and Work. Dell: New York.
Lawrence, G. (1984). A synthesis of learning style research involving the MBTI. Journal of Psychological Type, 8(1), 2-15.
Livio, M. (2003). The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World’s Most Astonishing Number. New York: Broadway Publishing.
McManus, I. C. (1980). The aesthetics of simple figure. British Journal of Psychology, 71, 505-524.
Moody, R. (1988). Personality preferences and foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 72(4), 389-401.
Murray, J. B. (1990). Review of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indictor. Perceptual and Motor skills, 70, 1187-1202.
Myers, I. B., and Myers, B. P. (1980). Gifts differing. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychological Press, Inc.
Myers, I.B. and M.H. McCaulley (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Nikolic, S. T., Cosic, I., Pecujlija, M, and Miletic, A. (2011). The effect of the 'golden ratio' on consumer behaviour. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (20), 8347-8360.
Ohnmacht, F. W. (1970). Personality and cognitive referents of creativity: A second look. Psychological Reports, 26, 336-338.
Pittard, N., Ewing, M., and Jevons, C. (2007). Aesthetic theory and logo design: examining consumer response to proportion across cultures. International Marketing Review, 24(4), 457-473.
Pittenger, D. J.(1993). Measuring the MBTI...and coming up short. Journal of Career Planning and Placement, 54, 48-53.
Pope, M. R. (1997). Creativity and the computer professional: The impact of personality perception on innovation approach preferences in terms of creative thinking and behavior. Dissertation Abstracts International, 58, 1366.
Richter, R. H., and Winter, W. D. (1966). Holtzman Inkblot correlates of creative potential. Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment, 30, 62-67.
Roy, D. D. (1996). Personality model of fine artists. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 391-394.
Schaik, P. V., and Ling, J. (2003). The effects of screen ratio and order on information retrieval in web pages. Displays, 24, 187-195.
Srivastava, B. (1982). A study of creative abilities in relation to socio-economic-status and culture. Perspectives in Psychological Researches, 5(2), 37-40.
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tegano, D. W. (1990). Relationship of tolerance of ambiguity and playfulness to creativity. Psychological Reports, 66, 1047-1056.
Wiggins, J. S. (1989). Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The length mental measurements yearbook (Vol. 10, pp. 536-538). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute.
Willis, C. G. (1984). Review of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. In D. J. Keyser and R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques (Vol. 1, pp. 482-490). Kansas City, MO: Test Corp. of America.
曾脩文、郭碧祝(2012)。影響國中生科學知識觀之背景因素。屏東市：國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所之未出版碩士論文。
簡君倫、連廷嘉(2010)。大學生性格類型、生涯自我效能與生涯決定之相關研究。新竹市：國立新竹教育大學教育心理與諮商學系之未出版碩士班論文。