瞳孔變化量用於汽車圖片引發情緒反應之評鑑 / Pupillary variation to emotional response evoked by car images
摘要
傳統感性工學研究多是以問卷擷取轉化人們的感受，相較於問卷所得到的心理主觀資料，生理數值量測則是針對受測者的感知反應，在受試者沒有察覺的情形下做記錄，也較難以刻意控制。本研究使用監測瞳孔尺寸來做為人們對於刺激物的生理反應值，並輔以問卷評量的方式，針對30張汽車圖片進行實驗。
結果顯示，人們觀看三類(正向、中性、負向情緒)汽車圖片時，在觀看引發負向情緒圖片時，瞳孔變化量大於觀看正向與中性的的圖片，而觀看正向與中性的圖片時瞳孔變化量沒有顯著性的差異。也就是說，汽車能引發出人們極端負向的情緒。但對於汽車的不滿有可能會被加以放大，導致人們對於正向刺激物主觀評價得分沒有獲得高分，瞳孔變化量亦呈現較小的變化量。根據生理與心理的評價，結果支持受測者瞳孔變化與主觀評價之間有所關聯，且某些產品可以引發極端負值。
Most traditional Kansei Engineering evaluations rely on questionnaires to convert user subjective opinion to objective data. User perception is highly correlated with emotion and sensitive. People cannot easily control their physiological signals voluntarily. Therefore, this study explores the relationship between pupil size and user subjective opinion using thirty vehicle images as stimuli. The stimuli are composed of positive, negative, and neutral images.
The results indicated that the measurement of pupil size couldn’t distinguish between positive and neutral emotional responses. Negative emotional responses to products were reflected stronger than the other emotional responses. On the other hand, the vehicle images can evoke extreme negative emotion. As well as if people have bad feeling about the image, the feeling will be magnified. Due to the subjective evaluation score of positive stimuli get a lower score and pupillary variations also showed a small pupillary variation. The data provide support the pupil’s response and subjective judgment during affective picture viewing have relationship.
關鍵詞
全文：
PDF參考文獻
Allen, J., Harmon-Jones, E., & Cavender, J. (2001). Manipulation of frontal EEG asymmetry through biofeedback alters self-reported emotional responses and facial EMG. Psychophysiology, 38(04), 685-693.
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 644-656.
Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276-292.
Berntson, G., Cacioppo, J., & Quigley, K. (1993). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Autonomic origins, physiological mechanisms, and psychophysiological implications. Psychophysiology, 30, 183-183.
Bove, L. (2010). Emotional Car Design and good talents. Retrieved Oct, 2010, from http://hubpages.com/hub/Emotional-Design-and-good-talents
Bradley, M. M., Miccoli, L., Escrig, M., & Lang, P. (2008). The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation. Psychophysiology, 45(4), 602-607.
Coates, D. (2002). Watches tell more than time: Product design, information, and the quest for elegance. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Connelly, S. (2014). LOOKING FURTHER WITH FORD 2014 TRENDS.
Conway, C. A., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., & Sahraie, A. (2008). Transient pupil constrictions to faces are sensitive to orientation and species. Journal of Vision, 8(3). doi: 10.1167/8.3.17.
Czerwinski, M., Horvitz, E., & Cutrell, E. (2001). Subjective duration assessment: An implicit probe for software usability.
Desmet, P. M. A. (2004). From disgust to desire: how products elicit emotions. Design and emotion: the experience of everyday things, 8-12.
Desmet, P. M. A., Overbeeke, K., & Tax, S. (2001). Designing products with added emotional value: development and application of an approach for research through design. The Design Journal, 4, 32-47.
Desmet, P. M. A., Porcelijn, R., & van Dijk, M. (2007). Emotional Design; Application of a Research-Based Design Approach. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 20(3), 141-155.
Hassenzahl, M. (2005). The thing and I: understanding the relationship between user and product Funology (pp. 31-42): Springer.
Hazlett, R. L., & Benedek, J. (2007). Measuring emotional valence to understand the user's experience of software. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(4), 306-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.11.005
Hempel, R. J., Tulen, J. H. M., van Beveren, N. J. M., Mulder, P. G. H., &
Hengeveld, M. W. (2007). Subjective and physiological responses to emotion-eliciting pictures in male schizophrenic patients. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(2), 174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.01.008
Hess, E. H., & Polt, J. (1960). Pupil size as related to interest value of visual stimuli. Science, 132(3423), 349-350.
Ho, C.-H., & Lu, Y.-N. (2014). Can pupil size be measured to assess design products? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 436-441. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.009
Hsiao, K.-A., & Chen, L.-L. (2006). Fundamental dimensions of affective responses to product shapes. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 36(6), 553-564.
Hsiao, S. W., & Liu, M. (2002). A morphing method for shape generation and image prediction in product design. Design Studies, 23(6), 533-556.
Hsu, S., Chuang, M., & Chang, C. (2000). A semantic differential study of designers' and users' product form perception. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 25(4), 375-391.
Huang, J., Ma, M., & Chen, C. (2007). Research on predicting models of annoyance under the operation of digital hi-tech products. Design Studies, 28(1), 39-58.
Hustwit, G. (Writer). (2009). Objectified. In G. Hustwit, S. Dots, & Veer (Producer). United States.
Jindo, T., & Hirasago, K. (1997). Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 105-114.
Jindo, T., Hirasago, K., & Nagamachi, M. (1995). Development of a design support system for office chairs using 3-D graphics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 49-62.
Johnson, M., Muday, J., & Schirillo, J. (2010). When viewing variations in paintings by Mondrian, aesthetic preferences correlate with pupil size. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(3), 161.
Jordon, P. (2000). Designing pleasurable products: London: Taylor & Francis.
Krampen, M. (1995). Semiotics in Architecture and Industrial/Product
Design. In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design (pp. 89-103). London, England Mit Press Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Kuchinke, L., Trapp, S., Jacobs, A., & Leder, H. (2009). Pupillary responses in art appreciation: Effects of aesthetic emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 156-163.
Kuchinke, L., Vo, M., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. (2007). Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 65(2), 132-140.
Lang, P. J. (1980). Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. H. J. J. B. Sidowski & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 119–137). Norwood: NJ:Ablex.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual.Technical Report A-8: University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Laparra-Hernandez, J., Belda-Lois, J., Medina, E., Campos, N., & Poveda, R. (2009). EMG and GSR signals for evaluating user's perception of different types of ceramic flooring. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(2), 326-332.
Lu, Y.-n., Hou, K.-c., & Ho, C.-h. (2012). Using pupil size variation for evaluating users’ emotion elicited by products. Paper presented at the the International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research 2012, Penghu.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: WH Freeman.
Mudd, S., Conway, C., & Schindler, D. (1990). The eye as music critic: Pupil response and verbal preferences. Studia Psychologica, 32(1-2), 23-30.
Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei Engineering - a New Ergonomic Consumer-
Oriented Technology for Product Development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 3-11.
Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring usability preference vs. performance. Communications of the ACM, 37(4), 66-75.
Norman, D. A. (2004). Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things: Basic Civitas Books.
Oka, S., Chapman, C., & Jacobson, R. (2000). Phasic Pupil Dilation Response to Noxious Stimulation. Journal of Psychophysiology, 14(2), 97-105.
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning (Vol. 47): University of Illinois Press.
Partala, T., & Surakka, V. (2003). Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(1-2), 185-198.
Regueiro, R., & G León, O. (2003). Estrés en decisiones cotidianas. Psicothema, 15(4), 533-538.
Renault. (2011). RENAULT'S DESIGN STRATEGY. 2011, from http://www.renault.com/en/innovation/l-univers-du-design/pages/strategie-design-renault.aspx
Steinhauer, S., Boller, F., Zubin, J., & Pearlman, S. (1983). Pupillary dilation to emotional visual stimuli revisited. Psychophysiology, 20, 472.
Tovey, M. (1997). Styling and design: intuition and analysis in industrial design. Design Studies, 18(1), 5-31.
Umiker-Sebeok, D. (1987). Marketing and semiotics: New directions in the study of signs for sale: Mouton de Gruyter.
Vo, M., Jacobs, A., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., & Hutzler, F. (2008). The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 130-140.
Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
Woods, W. A. (1960). Psychological dimensions of consumer decision. The Journal of Marketing, 15-19.