å‹ä¼´å‹•ç‰©èˆ‡æ©Ÿå™¨å¯µç‰©å°äººéš›äº’動之影響ï¼Effects of Companion Pets on Interpersonal Interactions

黃瀅伃 Ying-Yu, Huang, 游曉貞 Hsiao-Chen, You

摘要


機器寵物與人工智慧技術的發展日漸æˆç†Ÿï¼Œæ¶‰åŠäººèˆ‡æ©Ÿå™¨å¯µç‰©ä¹‹é–“社交互動的 感性議題也漸漸被關注。而國外é‡å°å‹ä¼´å‹•ç‰©çš„研究指出，動物的å‹ä¼´ç‰¹è³ª （Companion）除了帶給牠的飼主娛樂與陪伴外，也具備社交催化劑之效果，å¯ä¿ƒ 進他人與飼主產生社交互動。因此，在æ€è€ƒæ©Ÿå™¨å¯µç‰©èˆ‡äººçš„社交互動或感性設計時， ä¸æ‡‰åƒ…ä¾·é™æ–¼æ©Ÿå™¨å¯µç‰©èˆ‡å…¶ä½¿ç”¨è€…之間的人機互動，更å¯å»¶ä¼¸æŽ¢è¨Žå¦‚何é€éŽæ„Ÿæ€§è¨­ 計的方法論，讓使用者能夠藉由機器寵物的å‹ä¼´ç‰¹è³ªä¾†ä¿ƒé€²ä½¿ç”¨è€…與週é­ç’°å¢ƒä¸­çš„ 人們互動，以建立期望中的社交關係 。因此，本研究ä¼åœ–以實驗設計來檢視å‹ä¼´å‹• 物是å¦å°åœ‹äººä¹Ÿæœ‰ç¤¾äº¤å‚¬åŒ–的效應；更進一步探索機器寵物能å¦é”到類似å‹ä¼´å‹•ç‰© 的社交催化效應以增進使用者的社交互動。本研究利用真狗與人造狗為實驗é“具進 行兩階段的實驗：第一階段是為驗證寵物狗或機器狗å°åœ‹äººç¤¾äº¤äº’動影響之有無， å››ä½å¯¦é©—者於日常活動中分別在：無狗陪伴ã€å¯µç‰©ç‹—陪伴åŠçµ¨æ¯›æ©Ÿå™¨ç‹—é™ªä¼´ä¸‰ç¨®ä¸ åŒæ¢ä»¶ä¸‹ï¼Œé€£çºŒäº”天以羅徹斯特互動紀錄é‡è¡¨é€²è¡Œèˆ‡ä»–人互動情形記錄；çµæžœç™¼ç¾ 寵物狗確å¯ä½œç‚ºç¤¾äº¤å‚¬åŒ–劑來促進他人與實驗者之互動，æå‡ç¤¾äº¤äº’動的次數ã€äº’ 動時間長度；但絨毛機器狗å°äººéš›äº’動之影響則ä¸é¡¯è‘—。第二階段則為é‡æ¸…ä¸åŒå½¢ å¼çš„機器狗作為社交催化劑的效果，由一ä½å¯¦é©—者於æ¯é€±å›ºå®šæ™‚間，分別在學校辦 公室ã€å…¬è»Šç«™å‰åŠè›‹ç³•åº—三處地點，以無狗陪伴ã€çµ¨æ¯›æ©Ÿå™¨ç‹—陪伴åŠæ™ºæ…§æ©Ÿå™¨ç‹—陪 伴三種æ¢ä»¶ä¸‹ï¼Œç´€éŒ„與他人互動情形，æ¯ç¨®çµ„åˆå„兩次，æ¯æ¬¡30 分é˜ï¼Œå…±è¨ˆå八次 實驗。除了實驗者主動記錄他與路人的互動情形外，å¦ä¸€ä½è¨˜éŒ„者也從æ—進行紀錄 åŠè§€å¯Ÿã€‚紀錄經統計分æžå¾Œé¡¯ç¤ºï¼Œæ“控機器狗的外觀ã€æ質ã€åŠŸèƒ½ç­‰è®Šé …，å°å…¶ç¤¾ 交催化效果的影åƒä¸¦ä¸é¡¯è‘—ï¼›å倒是，實驗進行場所å°ç¤¾äº¤å‚¬åŒ–的影響較大。

 

Foreign studies have shown that companion animals can act as catalysts to promote human social interaction. With the rapid progress of robotics technologies, robotic pets have emerged in the market to offer services, such as companionship and socializing purposes. Under these considerations, this study adopted the experimental design to explore whether or not pet dogs can serve as social catalysts to facilitate interpersonal interaction in our current society, and to explore whether or not the social catalysis effect can be achieved when robotic dogs replace real pets. The investigation is divided into two stages: in the first stage, whether or not pet dogs or robotic dogs have an impact on the people’s social interactions was explored. In the second stage, the effect of robotic dogs that vary in appearance, material, and function, as well as other external factors used as mediums to promote interpersonal interactions was clarified. The results showed that pet dogs indeed could serve as social catalysts that promote the peoples’ interpersonal interactions and increase the frequency and the duration of social interaction. The best results were seen especially among close friends. However, the catalysis effect of robotic dogs was not significant in this study. Instead, the effect of different venues on the social interaction was more significant.


關鍵詞


友伴動物; 機器寵物; 社交互動; 社交催化; 修訂羅徹斯特互動記錄量表

全文：

v6i1-3_PDF

參考文獻


AIBO（2014）。Aibos History。上網日期：2014 å¹´10 月14 日， 網å€ï¼šhttp://www.sony-aibo.com/aibos-history/

Anderson, W. P., Reid, C. M., & Jennings, G. L. (1992). Pet ownership and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. The Medical Journal of Australia, 157(5), 298-301.

BANDAI（2014a）。Smart Pet。上網日期：2014 å¹´10 月3 日， 網å€ï¼šhttp://sp.asovision.com/play/index.html

BANDAI（2014b）。Hello! Zoomer。上網日期：2014 å¹´10 月3 日，網å€ï¼šhttp://www.takaratomy.co.jp/products/omnibot/hellozoomer/

Banks, M. R., Willoughby, L. M., & Banks, W. A. （2008）. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9（3）, 173-177.

Biundo, S., Holler, D., Schattenberg, B., & Bercher, P. (2016). Companion technology: An overview. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 30(1), 11-20.

Cutt, H. E., Knuiman, M. W., & Giles-Corti, B. （2008）. Does getting a dog increase recreational walking? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5（1）, 17.

Eddy, J., Hart, L. A., & Boltz, R. P. (1988). The effects of service dogs on social acknowledgments of people in wheelchairs. The Journal of Psychology, 122(1), 39-45.

Friedmann, E., Katcher, A. H., Lynch, J. J., & Thomas, S. A. (1980). Animal companions and one-year survival of patients after discharge from a coronary care unit. Public health reports, 95(4), 307.

GIGAOM（2014）。What is a robot? The answer is constantly evolving。上網日期：2015 å¹´6 月27 日， 網å€ï¼šhttps://gigaom.com/2014/07/05/what-is-a-robot-theanswer-

is-constantly-evolving/

Hunt, S. J., Hart, L. A., & Gomulkiewicz, R. (1992). Role of small animals in social interactions between strangers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132(2), 245-256.

IFR（2014a）。Industrial robots。上網日期：2014 å¹´10 月13 日， 網å€ï¼šhttp://www.ifr.org/industrial-robots/

IFR（2014b）。Service robots。上網日期：2014 å¹´10 月13 日， 網å€ï¼šhttp://www.ifr.org/service-robots/

Kidd, C. D., Taggart, W., & Turkle, S. (2006, May). A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. In Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 3972-3976).

McNicholas, J., & Collis, G. M. (2000). Dogs as catalysts for social interactions: Robustness of the effect. British Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 61-70.

Melson, G. F., Kahn Jr, P. H., Beck, A. M., Friedman, B., Roberts, T., & Garrett, E. (2005, April). Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd. In CHI'05 extended abstracts on Human

factors in computing systems (pp. 1649-1652). ACM.

Messent, P. R. (1983). Social facilitation of contact with other people by pet dogs. New perspectives on our lives with companion animals, 37-46.

Moretti, F., De Ronchi, D., Bernabei, V., Marchetti, L., Ferrari, B., Forlani, C., Negretti, F., Sacchetti, C. & Atti, A. R. (2011). Pet therapy in elderly patients with mental illness. Psychogeriatrics, 11(2), 125-129.

Roa Seiler, N., & Benyon, D. (2010). Designing Companions with Kansei. In proceedings of International Conference on Kansei Engineering and Emotion Research, Paris, France.

Stanton, C. M., Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L., Ruckert, J. H., & Gill, B. T. （2008, March）. Robotic animals might aid in the social development of children with autism. In Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on (pp. 271-278). IEEE.

Wheeler, L., & Nezlek, J. (1977). Sex differences in social participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(10), 742.

王永貞 (2008). 當寵物é‡ä¸Šäºº-- 我是伴侶 ä¸æ˜¯å…¬å®³ï¼å“越雜誌, vol.286, 2008 å¹´6 月, pp.101-103.

林以正ã€é»ƒé‡‘蘭（2006）。親密感之日常社會互動基礎: 一個縱貫å¼çš„ç ”ç©¶ã€‚ä¸­è¯å¿ƒç†å­¸åˆŠï¼Œ48（1），35-52。

å³æ€¡ä¼¶ï¼ˆ2006）動物æºé€šï¼šå¯µç‰©ä½œç‚ºäººéš›äº’動的中介。世新大學，å£èªžå‚³æ’­ 學系，碩士學ä½è«–文。

蔡岳廷（2009）å°ç£æ°‘çœ¾å¯µç‰©é£¼é¤Šè¡Œç‚ºä¹‹ç ”ç©¶: 計畫行為ç†è«–之應用。å°åŒ—世新大學社會心ç†å­¸ç ”究所碩士論文, 1-3。

簡妤儒（2002）寵物商å“化與價值變é·? 分æž1950 å¹´ä»£å¾ŒçŠ¬å¸‚å ´çš„å½¢æˆèˆ‡è®Šé·ï¼Œå°ç£å¤§å­¸ç¤¾æœƒå­¸ç ”究所碩士論文。