泡殼包裝之視觸覺感性研究/Research on Visual and Tactile Perception of Blister Packaging by using Kansei Engineering

陳璽任 Hsi-Jen Chen, 游尚儒 Shang-Ru Yu, 陳語晨 Yu-Chen Chen

摘要


      隨著使用者體驗的重要性日益提升,感性設計要素成為產品之間競爭優勢的關鍵,消費者需求逐漸由功能性轉為心理需求。然而在消費過程中與消費者感官最先接觸的媒介─包裝,其物理特性與質感變化卻較少被探討。本研究透過感性工學探討塑膠泡殼包裝之意象,建立出形狀、厚度與意象之間的關聯。透過分析5種厚度與3種形狀,共15種樣品,觀察受測者在厚度與形狀的變化組合之下對感性語彙的評價差異,進而討論:(1) 泡殼包裝在不同感官感知間的感性意象差;(2) 泡殼包裝的厚度與形狀所產生的感性意象。結果表明,泡殼包裝厚度與形狀對消費者心理影響的重要性,依感性語彙中的差異結果可將厚度分為低厚度(0.4 mm)、中厚度(0.5 mm, 0.6 mm)及高厚度(0.7 mm, 0.8 mm);形狀上則是依包裝上的結構不同而產生不一樣的意象。

 

      With the growing importance of product functions and technology, the importance of consumers’ perceptual experience has become increasingly important. Packaging is the first medium to contact consumers' senses in the consumption process. Among them, plastic is the most commonly used material in packaging manufacturing. Therefore, this research will explore the Kansei image of blister packaging through vision and tactile perception, to understand how packaging affects consumers’ image perception. This study analyzes 15 samples (5 thicknesses x 3 shapes), and discusses: (1) the difference in perceptual image of blister packaging between different sensory perceptions; (2) the perceptual image of thickness and shape of blister packaging. The results showed that thickness and shape mainly affects the sense of touch and visual-tactile perception. According to the Kansei images, the thickness can be divided into low thickness (0.4mm), medium thickness (0.5mm, 0.6mm) and high thickness (0.7mm, 0.8mm). The Kansei image of blister packaging will be different under the interaction of its constituent elements.


關鍵詞


感性; 包裝; 形狀; 厚度; 視觸覺

全文:

PDF

參考文獻


Bruner, J. S. (1975). The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of child language, 2(1), 1-19.

Choi, K., & Jun, C. (2007). A systematic approach to the Kansei factors of tactile sense regarding the surface roughness. Applied Ergonomics, 38(1), 53-63.

Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2012). The "Visual Depiction Effect" in Advertising: Facilitating Embodied Mental Simulation through Product Orientation. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(6), 988-1003. doi:10.1086/661531.

Gleitman, H., Reisberg, D., & Gross, J. (1995). Psychology 3e Im. In: W. W. Norton & Company.

Grohmann, B., Spangenberg, E. R., & Sprott, D. E. (2007). The influence of tactile input on the evaluation of retail product offerings. Journal of Retailing, 83(2), 237-245.

Hepworth, B. (1954). Barbara Hepworth: A Retrospective Exhibition of Carvings and Drawings from 1927 to 1954, Held at the Whitechapel Art Gallery, 8th April-6th June, 1954: The Gallery.

Hussain, B. I., & Safiulla, M. (2018). Comparative study of cooling systems for vacuum forming tool. Materials Today: Proceedings, 5(1), 30-36.

Kim, H. K., Han, S. H., Park, J., & Park, J. (2016). Identifying affect elements based on a conceptual model of affect: A case study on a smartphone. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 53, 193-204.

Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (2003). Touch. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Experimental psychology, Vol. 4 (p. 147–176). John Wiley & Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0406

Kleinginna, P. R., & Kleinginna, A. M. (1981). A categorized list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion, 5(4), 345-379.

Krippendorff, K. (2005). The semantic turn: A new foundation for design Florida: CRC Press.

Krishna, A., Cian, L., & Aydinoglu, N. Z. (2017). Sensory Aspects of Package Design. Journal of Retailing, 93(1), 43-54. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2016.12.002.

Krishna, A. (2006). Interaction of senses: The effect of vision versus touch on the elongation bias. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 557-566.

Lauer, D. A., & Pentak, S. (2011). Design basics: Cengage Learning.

Lederman, S. J., & Klatzky, R. L. (1987). HAND MOVEMENTS - A WINDOW INTO HAPTIC OBJECT RECOGNITION. Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 342-368. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90008-9.

Lévy, P., Nakamori, S., & Yamanaka, T. (2008). Explaining Kansei Design Studies. Paper presented at the Design and Emotion Conference 2008.

Littel, S., & Orth, U. R. (2013). Effects of package visuals and haptics on brand evaluations. European Journal of Marketing, 47(1/2), 198-217.

Mackenzie, D. (1997). Green design: design for the environment: Books Nippan.

Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). To have and to hold: The influence of haptic information on product judgments. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 35-48.

Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The Effect of Mere Touch on Perceived Ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(3), 434-447. doi:10.1086/598614.

Prytherch, D., & McLundie, M. (2002). So what is haptics anyway?. Research Issues in Art, Design and Media, 2, 29.

Roy, R., Goatman, M., & Khangura, K. (2009). User-centric design and Kansei Engineering. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 1(3), 172-178.

Schifferstein, H. N. (2006). The perceived importance of sensory modalities in product usage: A study of self-reports. Acta psychologica, 121(1), 41-64.

Schultz, L. M., & Petersik, J. T. (1994). Visual-haptic relations in a two-dimensional size-matching task. Perceptual and motor skills, 78(2), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1994.78.2.395

Stewart, B. (1994). Packaging design strategy. Florida: CRC Press.

Vanfleteren, J., Chtioui, I., Plovie, B., Yang, Y., Bossuyt, F., Vervust, T., . . . Vandecasteele, B. (2014). Arbitrarily Shaped 2.5D Circuits Using Stretchable Interconnections and Embedding in Thermoplastic Polymers. Procedia Technology, 15, 208-215. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2014.09.073

Whitaker, T. A., Simões-Franklin, C., & Newell, F. N. (2008). Vision and touch: Independent or integrated systems for the perception of texture?. Brain research, 1242, 59-72.

Yamaoka, J., & Kakehi, Y. (2016). DrawForming: An interactive fabrication method for vacuum forming. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction.

馬敏元、劉素瑜(2018)。觸覺體驗教材與兒童創造力之初探。感性學報,6(1),4-23。

莊明振、陳勇廷、張耀仁(2013)。產品觸覺意象的探討-以握杯為例。感性學報,1(1),28-45。

陳勇廷、莊明振(2015)。視覺與觸覺意象評估差異之探討。感性學報,2(2),4-27。