以在地識別意象探討產品之認同與偏好 / A study on product design with local culture features and its effect on product identity and preference
摘要
本研究以具台灣芝山岩文化史蹟公園文化特性之圖案設計，於籐編沙發椅墊及提袋產品上之應用為例，探討具在地文化特性之產品意象構成要因，以及影響產品被認同與偏好之意象，並了解相同圖案應用在不同產品上時，是否存在認知差異，同時檢驗美感會是影響認同與偏好之假設。首先透過里民訪談與問卷調查找出芝山岩文化特性，接著將文化特性融入至兩種產品之圖案設計中；最後以SD法實施兩種產品之識別意象、偏好與認同之調查，並透過主成份、集群與多元迴歸等分析方法加以比較。研究發現兩種產品具有相似之意象構成要因;分別為「在地印象」、「美感」與「獨特性」，但重要順序不同，顯示相同圖案設計應用在不同產品上，觀者之意象認知反應存在差異，椅墊首重「美感」，提袋則重「在地印象」。影響兩種產品被認同與受喜歡主要之共同意象，均是「美麗的」意象，而非「在地文化象徵的」。表示「美麗的」在此類文化產品中是值得重視的因子，強化該因子有助於提高被喜歡與認同之預測。
The purpose of this study was to determine how products carrying local cultural images created a perception of identity and preference among participants. Moreover, this study explored whether different products employed with the same pattern designs affected participant’s perception, and justify a hypothesis that aesthetic was a key factor on product identity and product preference. Cultural attributes from Zhishan Cultural and Ecological Garden in Taiwan were extracted and developed into design patterns which were then implemented into rattan sofa cushions and handbags for further investigating with product image identity and preference. Using thesemanticdifferential methodand treating with principal factor analysis, cluster analysis and multiple regression analysis, results showed that the product images perceived by the participants for the two products could be classified into three distinct factors: local identity, aesthetic value and uniqueness. The primary factor for enhancing both product identity and preference was the aesthetic value instead of the local cultural identity. It was also found that the same patterns implemented into different products resulted in different perceptual responses in the participants.
全文：
PDF參考文獻
Ahuvia, A. C. (2005). Beyond the Extended Self: Loved Objects and Consumers’ Identity Narratives. Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 32, No. 1.
Aldersey-Williams, H. (1992). World design: Nationalism and globalism in design. New York: Rizzoli.
Bloch, P., Brunel, F.,& Arnold, T. (2003). Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: concept and measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 551-565.
Boulding, K. E. (1956). The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society . University of Michigan Press.
Chang, W. C., &Wu, T. Y. (2007). Exploring types and characteristics of product forms. International Journal of Design , 1(1), 3-14.
Chang, C.C., &Wu, J.C.(2009). The underlying factors dominating categorical perception of product form of mobile phones. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39, 667-680.
Chuang, M.C., &Ma, Y.C. (2001). Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 27, 233-245.
Creusen, M. E. H., &Schoormans, J. P. L. (2005). The different roles of product appearance in consumer choice. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(1), 63-81.
Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., & Clarkson, P. J. (2004). Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Design Studies , 25, 547–577.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Robinson, R. E. (1990). The art of seeing: an interpretation of the aesthetic experience. J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles, CA.
Desmet, P. M. A., & Hekkert, P. (2007). Framework of product experience. International Journal of Design, 1(1), 57-66.
De Bont, C. J. P. M., Schoormans, J.P. L., & Wessel, M. T. T. (1992). Consumer personality and the acceptance of product design, Design Studies , Vol.13, No. 2. Eliade M. (1961). Images and Symbols (translated by Philip Mairet, Sheed& Ward, New York.)
Gerstner, K. (1986). The forms of color -The Interaction of Visual Elements . London: The MIT Press.
Itten J. (1961). The Art of Colour. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Karjalainen, T. M., & Warell, A. (2005). Do you recognize this tea flask? Transformation of brand-specific product identity through visual design cues. Proceedings of the international Deign Congress, IASDR 2005. Doulious:National Yunlin University of Science and Technology.
Karjalainen, T. M. (2007). It looks like a Toyota: Educational approaches to designing for visual brand recognition. International Journal of Design , 1(1), 67-81.
Lai, H. H., Chang, Y. M., & Chang, H. C. (2005). A robust design approach for enhancing the feeling quality of a product: A car profile case study. International Journal of
Industrial Ergonomics, 35(5), 445-460.
Leong, D., & Clark, H. (2003). Culture-based knowledge towards new design thinking and practice - A dialogue. Design Issues , 19(3), 48-58.
Lewalski, Z. M. (1988). Product esthetics: an interpretation for designers. Design & Development Engineering Press, Carson City, NV.
Lin, R. T. (2007). Transforming Taiwan aboriginal cultural features into modern product design: A case study of a cross- cultural product design model. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 45-53.
Norman, D. A. (1988). The design of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
Page, C., & Herr, P. M. (2002). An investigation of the processes by which product design and brand strength interact to determine initial affect and quality judgments. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 133-147.
Razzaghi, M., Ramirez Jr, M., & Zehner, R. (2009). Cultural patterns in product design ideas: comparisons between Australian and Iranian student concepts. Design Studies , 30(4), 438-461.
Richins, M. L. (1997). Measuring emotions in the consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (2), 127–46.
Schadewitz, N. (2009). Design patterns for cross-cultural collaboration. International Journal of Design, 3(3), 37-53.
Sweet, F. (1999). Frog: form follows emotion. London: Thames & Hudson.
Venketraman, M. P., Merlino. D., Kardes, F.R.,& Sklar, K. B. (1990). The interactive effects of message appeal and individual differences on information processing and persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 7, No 2. 85-96.
Wilson, S. (1997). The aesthetics of intelligent systems design, IEEE Expert 12:11-2.
王桂沰 (2005)。企業•品牌•識別•形象:符號思維與設計方法。台北市 : 全華。 伍德華 (Kathryn Woodward) (2006)。認同與差異(Identity and Difference)(林文琪譯)。台北縣 : 韋伯。(原作 1997 年出版)。
克蘭恩 (MikeCrang) (2003)。文化地理學 (Cultural Geography)。( 王志弘、余佳玲、方淑惠譯 )。台北市 : 巨流。(原作 1998 年出版)。 李亦園 (2003)。說文化 . 談宗教 : 人類學的觀點(頁 18-38)。台北市 : 台大。
李明松、何明泉(2005)。具在地識別陶瓷商品設計之研究。碩士論文,國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所。
何明泉、林其祥、劉怡君(1996)。文化商品開發設計之構思。設計學報 ,1(1),1-15。
周君瑞、陳國祥 (2003)。感性化商品造形之塑造 - 以造形特徵為基礎。設計學報 , 8(2), 77-88。
施百鍊編著、郭欽智校正(1998)。芝山岩之古蹟與傳說 。芝山岩惠濟宮發行。
馬敏元 (2010)。淺談日本新產品開發之感「心」技術。工業材料雜誌 , 280, 160-172。
唐納 . 諾曼 (Donald A. Norman) (2011)。情感 @ 設計 (Emotional design: why we love or hate every things)。( 王鴻祥、翁鵲嵐、鄭玉屏、張志傑譯 )。大眾心理館。(原作 2004 年出版)。
莊明振、陳俊智 (2003)。產品型態特徵與嘔成關係影響消費者感性評價之研究 - 以水壺的設計為例。設計學報 ,9(3),43-58。
莊雅量、陳玲玲 (2007)。CAKE: 擴充性感性意象調查與分析系統。設計學報,12(3),63-80。
陳殿禮、洪珮芬 (2008)。排灣族琉璃珠文化意象構成因素之研究。設計學報 , 13(2), 89-107。
費斯基 (John Fiske) (1995)。傳播符號學理論(Introduction to Communication Studies)(張錦華譯)。台北市 : 遠流。(原作 1990 年出版)。
路易斯 (Jeff Lewis) (2005)。文化研究的基礎 (Cultural Studies: the basics)。( 邱誌勇、許夢芸譯 ) 。台北縣:韋伯。(原作 2001 年出版)。
鄭玉美(2004)。文化設計模式建構:中國傳統文化應用於產品造型模式探討。碩士論文,台北科技大學創新設計研究所 (頁 6-20)。
廖志忠、何明泉 ( 2004)。符合地方文化識別的指標設計研究 - 以阿里山國家風景村為例。大學發展與產學合作大學校院學術論文發表暨研討會 ( 論文集 ) ( 頁 B272-275)。
蔡子瑋 (1994)。產品意象語言研究 - 以本土意象為例。碩士論文,國立成功大學工業設計研究所。
台灣大百科全書 (http://taiwanpedia.culture.tw/web/content?ID=7795)